🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an event that started out as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has developed a corporate feel, growing to encompass events where Black people are paid to address predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The surge has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in winter, but also in autumn in the Britain, Deutschland, Ireland and the Holland.

The month has developed since those days, focusing less on the histories of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the month is celebrated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it develops is a good lesson in how co-option leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the summer we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels emboldened to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are expanding in Europe as a entirety.

In the US, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the state. A campaign to remove Black history and narrative from the archives is under way. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the celebration illustrates how minimally it can be effective if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized celebrations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the situation of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is required. A university professor, a prof at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just do away with things like Black History Month altogether, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an time that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an infrastructure that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed through the year (as some institutions are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not shy away from political issues, and provides room for people, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What use is simple recognition of the bygone era when it ignores the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Organizations who mark it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and alertness to subtle slights, but confronted with the dangers that impact society if anti-racism is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and responsive. Perhaps an total re-identification is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.